Re: FBI Raids on Anti-War Activists

September 27, 2010

Coleen Rowley, former FBI Special Agent:

The “FBI SWAT teams br[oke] down doors at 7 am Friday (Sept 24) morning and raid[ed] the homes of several anti-war leaders and activists in Minneapolis, Chicago and possibly a couple other Midwest cities.  Members of the FBI’s ‘Joint Terrorism Task Force’ spent a few hours at each Minneapolis residence, seizing personal photographs and papers, computers and cell phones as well as serving Federal Grand Jury subpoenas on the various activists.”

A summary, overall: “You can almost argue that a protest against the ‘war on terror’ is a terrorist act.”  One quote.  One mentality.  One goal (regardless of history/law).  COINTELPRO activities against “subversives” did not end with the Church Committee – and, FISA was only updated as a means of Retroactively providing Immunity to felonious crimes which took place on a national scale (as directed from the Oval Office).  “Directives” to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” remain – some hidden, some clear, yet obviously unabated.

Homegrown Terrorists”:

During the Orwellian labeling, fear, and panic incitements of the Bush administration, All of us understood an overt message: You Are Under Suspicion/We Are Watching You.  ‘All of us’ included the millions who spoke out or dissented, peacefully and patriotically, against . . . the highest levels of Executive abuses.  Those oppressive and regressive measures which [purposely] made average activists feel as if they could be arrested at any time, solely because the President viewed their protests (clarified in the Constitution/Bill of Rights) as ‘unpatriotic’ expressions possibly worthy of an ‘Enemy Combatant’ designation, served, without a doubt, to enhance certain senses: Our guaranteed Freedoms and Rights are only illusionary and/or temporary (depending on who is in power/what agenda currently prevails).

HUAC, in the present (through modern scales): “The war on dissent, rather than terrorism, continue[s] full steam.”  Is it disloyal to be ashamed, and outspoken, when our country is guilty of the following? : Secret Evidence.  Secret Accusers.  Secret Locations.  Secret (Tortured Confession) Methods.  Secret Sentences.  Secrets of the State.

Is it reasonable to be covertly, as well as openly, harassed into a voiceless (submissive) acceptance of the latter?  If so, to what country are we referring?

National Lawyers Guild Hotline

Winston Smith Rectifies Enemy Belligerents

Enhanced (Definitions of) Interrogations (Torture)

Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.