The Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention and Prosecution Act
“A public security risk.” An “enemy belligerent.” A “national security suspect.” Anything vague (purposely opening doors to . . .) about those terms? “Would extend to four days the period of time that law enforcement has to question a terrorist suspect before bringing the suspect before a judge.” To take full advantage of sleep deprivation, for example, the 48-hour level must first be achieved – in combination with other techniques (i.e., stress positions which were labeled as Torture in Medieval times, and waterboarding from the Spanish Inquisition). That way, the subject will become advantageously broken (physically and mentally), thus pliable, by the fourth day. If, as opposed to recent successes, he or she is not compliant to verbatim suggestion of confession points by that juncture, “authorities can [then] delay reading a . . . suspect’s Miranda rights ‘for as long as is necessary.’” True, liberals and other traitors will rise up and exclaim that this is “precisely the kind of interrogation the Constitution is designed to prohibit.” But, that only makes it more clear who is “with us or against us.”
Reliable Intelligence: “Prisoners Boiled Alive”
Enhanced (Definitions of) Interrogations (Torture)
Posted by SeaClearly 
